skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Warner_Locke, J S"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. At low fatigue loading frequencies of 0.1 Hz, the near crack tip pH of AA2024-T8 and AA7075-T6 diverge strongly, whereas at higher loading frequencies of 10 Hz they approach the bulk solution pH. In-situ micro pH probes positioned in line with crack plane show AA7075-T6 develops acidic crack tip pH ~3.5, whereas AA2024-T8 becomes strongly alkaline with pH ~11 at 0.1 Hz. This pH difference aligns with corrosion fatigue (CF) behavior where AA7075-T6 exhibits higher crack growth rates (da/ dN) compared to air while AA2024-T8 exhibits da/dN near that of lab air. As frequency increases, both alloys display pH converging toward the neutral bulk pH of 0.6MNaCl and both da/dN higher than lab air. Results are evaluated against a hypothesis in the literature suggesting alloy-specific crack wake cathodic reactions may set local pH and thereby influence CF kinetics in AA2xxx and AA7xxx Al alloys. Other possible hypotheses are evaluated. 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available November 10, 2026